GOP ramps up probe of EPA, DOE on fracturing

1 of 20 | Share

Fracking and natural gas drilling

House Republicans are ramping up their investigations into the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy regarding hydraulic fracturing and its safety.

In a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, two top Republicans question the attitude the agency has taken toward fracturing as it mulls possible regulations relating to the process, in which mixtures of water, sand and chemicals are blasted underground to break up shale rock and free up trapped oil and gas.

“We write to better understand EPA’s views on hydraulic fracturing and whether you have prejudged that hydraulic fracturing poses an environmental threat, even before the agency has completed a congressionally mandated review of the practice,” wrote House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and technology subcommittee Chairman James Lankford, R-Okla.

In a pointed question, the lawmakers ask the EPA if it can “cite a single instance where the practice of hydraulic fracturing has led to groundwater contamination?”

EPA is in the midst of a congressionally mandated, multi-year study of fracturing’s effect on water safety. The agency is seeking peer reviewers for a controversial draft study that suggested a likely link between fracturing and groundwater pollution associated with wells in Pavillion, Wyo. The EPA also is looking to write rules governing the disposal of the briny, chemical-laden byproducts of hydraulic fracturing.

Environmentalist critics of fracturing have pointed to numerous anecdotal instances where they claim the practice contaminated water supplies. But the oil and natural gas industry insists that the practice is safe and that no conclusive causal link has been established.

Issa also sent a letter to the Department of Energy requesting interviews with senior officials and accusing the department of not complying with a committee subpoena for documents. The committee has probed how DOE formed an expert panel tasked with advising the department on hydraulic fracturing.

“I hope you will cease these obstructive efforts and immediately comply with the Committee’s subpoena,” Issa wrote.

5 Comments

  1. Trail_Tramp

    What is the obsession with the phrase “mixtures of water, sand and chemicals are BLASTED underground”? There is no blasting, or explosion, or catastrophic earthquake. You simply increase the pump pressure until you “get a break” and then you pump away.

    #1
  2. pacificoil

    exactly trail_tramp…however that doesn’t sound as exciting and chaotic as “blasting” chemicals and sand. My favorite is the often showed animations of frac jobs on news channels explaining the process…apparently the fractures are many feet wide and reach miles above the wellbore according to their depictions.

    #2
  3. ?

    y’all don’t feel like the anecdotes point commonalities in all oil and gas drilling… cementing/casing/well integrity for deep wells?

    the lack of coordination, communication, education and cooperation between government, industry, and the public points to cultural weaknesses

    we could improve overall performance if we chose to discuss in public

    #3
  4. KQuest

    Is creating a doubt the same as establishing reasonable doubt? One man says to another ” Every time it rains I see a cloud, without clouds you don’t get rain” . The other replies ” have you been present every time it rains so you really don’t know that do you ?” America let’s be smart. In car safety development we use crash dummies so we don’t harm ourselves trying to save ourselves. What crash dummies do we want to use for fracking safety?

    #4
  5. aeroguy48

    Go Issa go.

    #5