Steffy: Other countries learning Macondo’s lessons

Other countries are learning the lesson from BP’s 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

In recent months, offshore disasters around the globe have prompted swift and stringent response from regulators.

After a 3,000-barrel spill from a deep-water well off Rio de Janeiro in November, in which no one was killed or injured, Brazil’s environmental regulator fined the rig’s operator, Chevron, and its owner, Transocean, about $34 million. That number likely will rise because it hasn’t specified an amount for a third fine levied late last month.

It also suspended Chevron’s drilling operations in late November and denied it access to new offshore fields.

While local politics figures into the response, it shows how regulators no longer trust the industry’s reassurances that it can contain – let alone prevent – a major deep-water disaster.

Then there’s Norway. Last week, its offshore safety agency slammed BP for a platform fire in July. No one died in the accident, caused by an overheated crane motor, but an investigation by the Petroleum Safety Authority yielded some familiar findings. It determined breaches related to “lack of maintenance, deficient maintenance management, inadequacies in risk identification and deficient barrier management.”

It ordered BP to overhaul its safety practices by Feb. 1 – something BP supposedly already did after the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

Both the findings of the investigation and BP’s response that it is “committed to learning from incidents such as this and to improving our performance” sound painfully familiar. The latter has been said by so many BP spokesmen so many times that it sounds more broken than BP’s safety record.

In some of the hottest oil plays around the globe, BP’s U.S. disaster has increased the burden of doubt on Western oil companies.

“What happened here is a factor,” said Jim Smith, an attorney specializing in energy issues with the Houston law firm Porter Hedges. “The industry has that much more incentive to be that much more careful. The ramifications are potentially global.”

Findings are on appeal

Meanwhile, in the U.S., BP and its associates in the Macondo project have appealed Interior Department findings that the company violated drilling regulations. The department notified BP of the violations in October, a year and a half after the accident, and issued more just last month.

Given the complexity and the magnitude of the Deepwater Horizon accident, a slower response than that of Norway or Brazil is understandable. In the meantime, though, the Interior Department lifted an industrywide moratorium on new drilling, and BP led the charge back into the Gulf. Even before it was notified of the violations, BP laid out a plan with the regulators for developing a portfolio of new deep-water wells.

U.S. regulators have steadfastly refused to consider BP’s sorry operating history, here and abroad, in considering its applications for new permits.

Instead, its moratorium treated all companies the same, and the new rules it enacted remain more prescriptive rather than the performance-based regulations adopted by Norway or Brazil.

What has BP learned?

Despite 22 deaths at its Texas City refinery since 2004, despite 11 deaths aboard the Deepwater Horizon, despite a couple hundred injured workers, and despite reciting the “lessons learned” excuse so many times it’s become a cliché, BP has failed to demonstrate that it has learned anything from its sordid history.

Instead, it’s ready to move on, to negotiate down the regulatory repercussions and resume its operations in the waters it despoiled less than two years ago.

Other countries are learning the lessons of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Are we?

Loren Steffy is the Chronicle’s business columnist. His commentary appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Contact him at loren.steffy@chron.com. His blog is at http://blogs.chron.com/lorensteffy. Follow him on his Facebook fan page and on Twitter at twitter.com/lsteffy.

3 Comments

  1. RAP

    Mr. Steffy,
    You just can’t help yourself not to badger BP. They are no different from the rest. It’s been a while since you have written another Bad story on them. I guess you have nothing else to write about. I guess the other oil companys can have a spill and that’s ok. Did they not have some mistakes also or is it that Transocean is now on the hook for the real reason of the spill that bothers you ? Could it be the last scientific report on how well the spill was eaten up by microbes and the quick recovery of the Gulf story got to you ? I worked for the oil company that everyone considers the best at everything for 20 years and believe me they are no better than BP. Unless you have worked for several oil companys what makes you such an expert ? I promise you this, BP treats their employees much better than the rest. Move on to something new. Your too good of a reporter to keep going in circles.

    #1
  2. Tex

    It continues to amaze me that Steffy still covers a subject he does not understand, does not care to understand, does not have the background to understand while being way to lazy to even attempt to understand.

    Steffy does not get it as long as the Chronicle continues to employ and pay him for the trash that gets published.

    I journalist with credibility would at least attempt to research his work to get the facts and the stories straight. Research is not in Steffy’s vocabulary and is certainly not his strong side.

    Suggest Mr. Steffy does a story on how fortunate Obama was that BP with its resources had the incident. There are less than a handful of companies out that would have survived this incident. Anyone else would have been out of business after a week and Obama would be doing the taxpayers handouts. Doubt if the Gulf coast would have seen massive clean up campaigns, TV adds to get people back to the Gulf after all the media lies and being handed billions of dollars in bogus claims. Obama and his scientists would still be out there scratching their heads.

    Steffy, please show some journalistic integrity for a change. Would probably be the first, which is OK.

    #2
  3. Lunchtime O'booze

    Steffy must still be looking for a buy opportunity in BP stock. Obviously he has Shell stock as he does not mention their GoM spill, their North Sea spill or their multiple Nigerian spills. Neither does he mention ConocoPhillips spill in China so he must have stock in them as well. Can only assume he owns stock in both the unmentioned and is looking to offload them at a high and buy into BP stock if he can talk them down.

    Steffy: when you are in hole keep digging – with your best buddies Anderson Cooper and Doug Brinkley.

    What has Steffy learned?

    #3