Texas heat brings power plants out of mothballs


Four mothballed power plants will come back online in the coming weeks to help ensure Texas’ main electric grid can handle demand for the rest of the summer.

Two Houston-area plants owned by NRG Energy and two near Dallas owned by Garland Power & Light will return to service at the request of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.

NRG says the two natural gas-fired units at the SR Bertron plant in Deer Park along the Ship Channel should be up and running by Sept. 1. The units, with a combined generating capacity of 292 megawatts, were taken offline in 2010.

Garland Power & Light’s two natural gas-fired units, with a combined capacity of 122 megawatts, could be online as early as next week, said utility spokeswoman Elizabeth Kimbrough.

A megawatt is enough to power about 200 Texas homes during the summer months, when air conditioning use is at its peak, according to ERCOT.

A combination of record high temperatures and a large number of plants going offline for unplanned maintenance in recent weeks drove the state’s main electric grid into crisis several times.

The state set a power use record on Aug. 2 and on Aug. 4 came close to rolling blackouts for what would have been just the fourth time in 21 years.

Hot weather came early this summer and has been much more intense than grid operators expected, leading to longer running times for many power plants and more frequent maintenance problems.

Cooling issues

The drought that has gripped much of Texas has not yet forced power plants to cut back operations, but ERCOT CEO Trip Doggett said it may become an issue later this summer.

Several plants have had problems when the temperature of water in cooling reservoirs didn’t drop enough overnight, leading to less efficient operations.

“Without rainfall in the near future, we anticipate increased generation outage rates because of power plant cooling water issues,” Doggett said.

ERCOT is required to make sure Texas has enough power plant capacity online to ensure a safe margin between supply and demand, but it generally can’t force a company to run a power plant.

In some parts of the country companies receive what are called capacity payments throughout the year to have power plants ready and available.

But ERCOT is an energy-only market, meaning market prices for power are supposed to provide the incentive for plant operators to keep units online.

In the case of the four units coming back online, ERCOT will pay the costs of taking them out of mothballs and cover their fixed costs, such as staff, maintenance and fuel.

ERCOT will call on the units only when necessary to avoid emergencies, so they won’t displace units that are online and bidding into the wholesale market, Doggett said.

“We don’t know if, or how much, these units will be needed, but if needed, the cost will be minor when divided by the 23 million consumers in the region and when compared to the much higher costs and problems from statewide rolling blackouts, which these units will help avoid,” Doggett said.

Electricity managers also can increase the margin between supply and demand by reducing demand.

Rolling blackout plan

Two statewide programs designed to prevent rolling blackouts call for industrial customers to drop nearly 1,300 megawatts of demand in an emergency.

Smaller demand reduction programs aim at residential customers.

Austin Energy, the city-owned utility for the state capital, provided free digital thermostats to nearly 90,000 homes in exchange for permission to reduce their air conditioning twice per hour for 10 minutes at a time from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.

An Austin Energy spokesman said the program reduced peak demand by 35 to 45 megawatts.

TXU Energy has a similar program in the Dallas area.



Categories: General
Tom Fowler

11 Responses

  1. […] now to keep up. So, the short term solution has been to bring some mothballed plants back on line. Four old natural gas-fired plants are coming back to life with the help of retired plant personnel called back to get Texas through […]

  2. Mike H. says:

    drb: There’s a big push to export gas being produced in the Barnett Shale. Gas producers make more money by selling it to China, than using it in new gas fired power plants. So, we’re exporting our “energy security”, as the pro-fracking types have called it when touting developing it.

  3. drb says:

    Sounds like the producers have been manipulating the market by keeping supply marginal. With natural gas at historical low prices and significant local supply you think some of the oil& coal facilities would have gone off line and the natural gas units would be brought online to increase profit margins & which are cleaner burning anyway. Yet a semi-government agency who will pass the cost on to the customer is bearing the cost of bringing these units online? Sounds like this is benefiting the producer and not the customer.

  4. Johan says:

    Lets see, we didn’t have enough electricity to go around last winter, We almost ran out this summer, now you want to take the plants out of mothball? It’s a little late isn’t it. ERCOT should have done this last year.

  5. Johnh says:

    Wind turbines are nothing more than a bunch of hot air.

  6. ntangle says:

    Tx Engr – Good idea. Maybe Uncle Warren can finance it.

  7. Geez Loieeze says:

    Green energy. The new corporate welfare of hope and change. What a farce.

  8. Texas Engineer says:

    Time to add the other two reactors to the STP nuclear plant…..can’t depend on solar or wind turbines to help much.

  9. morphy says:

    seems like a good idea to bring the mothballed plants on anyway with the hot conditions throughout the SW. Probably could sell the extra MWs if not needed.

  10. Jackalope says:

    Weren’t these plants also taken offline because they were supposedly replaced by wind turbines?

    • Tom Fowler says:

      Companies put older units into mothball status regularly (not the same units regularly, but in general) depending on market conditions and the time of year. It’s rarely a “this project started up so we’re shutting this one down” kind of decision. NRG has built wind projects in Texas, so it’s possible the addition of that wind power to their portfolio had some impact on the decision to shut other units down. But 1 megawatt of wind isn’t the same as 1 megawatt from a nat gas plant in terms of reliability etc.