EPA Spilled Milk Regulation Indicative of Broader Problem


EPA to Regulate Spilled Milk.

No, it’s not a headline from The Onion. The Wall Street Journal editorial board explains:

Two weeks ago, the Environmental Protection Agency finalized a rule that subjects dairy producers to the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure program, which was created in 1970 to prevent oil discharges in navigable waters or near shorelines. Naturally, it usually applies to oil and natural gas outfits. But the EPA has discovered that milk contains “a percentage of animal fat, which is a non-petroleum oil,” as the agency put it in the Federal Register.

In other words, the EPA thinks the next blowout may happen in rural Vermont or Wisconsin. Other dangerous pollution risks that somehow haven’t made it onto the EPA docket include leaks from maple sugar taps and the vapors at Badger State breweries.

The EPA rule requires farms—as well as places that make cheese, butter, yogurt, ice cream and the like—to prepare and implement an emergency management plan in the event of a milk catastrophe. Among dozens of requirements, farmers must train first responders in cleanup protocol and build “containment facilities” such as dikes or berms to mitigate offshore dairy slicks.

These plans must be in place by November, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture is even running a $3 million program “to help farmers and ranchers comply with on-farm oil spill regulations.” You cannot make this stuff up.

If the administration truly believes regulating Häagen-Dazs suppliers will help prevent another BP-scale disaster, it’s no wonder a federal judge decided to hold it in contempt this week for is gross mishandling of the Gulf spill response. These dubious decisions reinforce the notion of just how far current regulatory overreach extends.

This is just the latest example of regulatory overreach. EPA knows no limits to intrusion in our lives or the fact that it should be allocating its resources to the risks that produce the largest return to the public. Obviously, the administrator doesn’t understand more bang for the buck.

Categories: General
Bill O'Keefe

8 Responses

  1. Bangor Goode says:

    Not only does EPA regulate milk just like petroleum when it comes to spilled milk, but the same goes for cheese!

  2. Mike says:

    It says NAVIGABLE RIVERS and SHORELINES… how many dairy farms are next to a river with boating traffic or on the beach? Most dairy farms would not be affected by this legislation.

  3. Tim T. says:

    Link to the WSJ editorial is no good (points to someone’s webmail account).

  4. Milk Man says:

    What’s that old saying, it’s better for one to be thought an idiot than to open their mouth and remove all doubt? It’s time for a 40 day and 40 night rainstorm over Washington DC! No Ark, no politicians two by two, just a 40 day rainstorm to wipe out all the poster kids in DC so we can start over again and get the country on the right course again!

  5. SmarterThanLibs says:

    Forgot one… Omega 3 fish oils… in ALL fish.

    Holy Mackerel!

  6. SmarterThanLibs says:

    What is the scientific basis for claiming milk is a polution hazard? Because the same english word used to describe petrolium that comes out of the ground is used to describe liquid animal fat? Ummm…. what are these idiots going to do when they realize sperm whales have huge sacks of liquid animal fat (oil!) in their heads? What about whale and seal blubber? What about the oils that ducks and other sea birds coat their feathers with? Are they going to say these oil pruducing animals, that live in or on the sea,are now considered hazmat and must be exterminated? LMFAO… I have never seen so many morons concentrated in one spot (EPA) in my life!

  7. akw says:

    “…build “containment facilities” such as dikes or berms to mitigate offshore dairy slicks.”

    Are they freaking serious?


  8. bigfishh says:

    Thanks for exposing this as well as the other negative consequences of soft headed legislation in the hands of incompetent bureaucrats. We would never read it in te Chronicle new pages. They are too busy doing puff pieces on EPA administrators.